Who is Anthony Washington Sr.?

Anthony Washington Sr. is a U.S. Army and Maryland Army National Guard veteran, a coach and official of more than twenty years, and the founder of After Today, LLC. He builds leadership training, athletic recruiting education, and people-first AI systems for student-athletes, families, schools, and organizations. He is based in Pennsylvania and works primarily across Pennsylvania and Maryland.

What does Anthony Washington Sr. do?

He works in three connected areas: athletic recruiting education that gives student-athletes and families a repeatable daily process, leadership training for first-time supervisors and public-sector leaders, and people-first AI and workflow implementation for organizations. He also speaks and runs workshops for schools, teams, and districts.

What is athletic recruiting infrastructure?

Athletic recruiting infrastructure is the repeatable system a family or program uses to manage recruiting — film, academics, communication with coaches, eligibility tracking, and follow-up — instead of relying on exposure events and luck. Anthony teaches recruiting as infrastructure so progress comes from a daily practice rather than a seasonal scramble.

What does people-first AI implementation mean?

People-first AI implementation means adopting AI to improve the work without displacing or sidelining the people who do it. In practice that means starting from the actual workflow, keeping a human accountable for decisions, training staff on the tools they will use, and setting guardrails before scale — not buying software and hoping the team adapts.

Who are Anthony's programs designed for?

Student-athletes and their parents, high school and grassroots coaches, athletic programs, schools and districts, first-time supervisors, public-sector leaders, and organizations that want leadership training or help implementing AI without leaving employees behind.

Does Anthony Washington Sr. provide leadership training?

Yes. He trains first-time supervisors and team leads on the first ninety days, difficult conversations, accountability, and building trust, drawing on his military service, public-sector supervision, and coaching experience. Training is delivered as courses, workshops, and organizational consulting.

How can a school, district, or organization work with Anthony?

Schools, districts, and organizations can book speaking engagements and workshops, bring in leadership training for supervisors and staff, or engage him on recruiting support and AI and workflow implementation. Start on the contact page and say which of those you need.

How can I book Anthony Washington Sr. to speak?

Send an inquiry through the contact page with your event date, audience, format, and location. The speaking page lists topics, session formats, and the audiences he speaks to most often.

Where is Anthony Washington Sr. based?

He is based in Pennsylvania and works primarily across Pennsylvania and Maryland, with virtual sessions available beyond that area.

Home › Blog › Trump Renamed AI. But Did Artificial Intelligence Actually Change?

Trump Renamed AI. But Did Artificial Intelligence Actually Change?

government · October 1, 2026

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on September 29, 2026, directing the executive branch to replace the terms Artificial Intelligence and AI with Super Intelligence and SI in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other…

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on September 29, 2026, directing the executive branch to replace the terms Artificial Intelligence and AI with Super Intelligence and SI in official correspondence, public communications, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory materials.[1]

Yes.

You read that correctly.

Artificial Intelligence is now supposed to become:

Super Intelligence.

At least inside the federal executive branch.

The White House says the new terminology better reflects the capabilities and potential of modern AI systems.[1]

The technology did not suddenly change.

The language did.

And I think that distinction matters.

This Is Primarily a Government Language Change

Let us start with what the executive order actually does.

Federal executive departments and agencies are directed, to the maximum extent permitted by law, to use Super Intelligence and SI instead of Artificial Intelligence and AI in new official communications and non-statutory documents.[1]

The order does not require the federal government to rewrite every old regulation, contract, grant, executive order, or historical document.

And it does not magically remove the term “artificial intelligence” from federal statutes.

Congress has already used that terminology in law.

For now, the executive order says “Super Intelligence” means the same technologies covered by the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence unless Congress or future presidential action changes that definition.[1]

That is important.

Because this is not yet a technical redefinition of the technology.

It is largely a rebranding of how the executive branch talks about it.

Words Matter More Than We Think

At first glance, this may seem cosmetic.

Maybe it is partly cosmetic.

But language shapes perception.

“Artificial” can sound fake.

Synthetic.

Imitative.

Something less than genuine intelligence.

“Super” communicates something completely different.

Superior capability.

Expansion.

Power.

Possibility.

Something beyond ordinary human capability.

The White House itself framed the change around the idea that today’s systems increasingly do more than imitate human intelligence and instead amplify human creativity and capability.[1]

Whether people agree with that framing or not, the terminology sends a message.

The federal government is not trying to make the technology sound smaller.

It is making it sound bigger.

There Is a Risk in the Name Too

This is where AI discernment becomes important.

Calling something Super Intelligence does not automatically make it super intelligent.

AI systems still make mistakes.

They can hallucinate information.

They can misinterpret context.

They can generate weak analysis.

They can produce confident answers that are wrong.

They remain dependent on data, architecture, human design, deployment decisions, safeguards, and oversight.

So while the terminology may become more ambitious, our judgment cannot become less skeptical.

Actually, the opposite may be necessary.

The stronger the name sounds, the more important it becomes for people to understand what the system can and cannot actually do.

A more impressive label should not create less critical thinking.

The Federal Definition Could Change Next

This executive order may become more consequential later.

It directs the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology to submit proposed legislative language within 60 days for a federal definition of “Super Intelligence” and “SI.”[1]

That proposal is supposed to evaluate whether the new definition should modify, expand, or replace the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence.

That is where this could move beyond branding.

Because once terminology begins entering legislation, regulation, procurement, grants, compliance requirements, and agency policy, definitions start carrying legal consequences.

Right now:

AI and SI are largely being treated as the same thing inside the order.

The next question is whether they remain the same thing.

Companies Do Not Have to Rename AI Tomorrow

Another distinction matters.

The executive order applies to the federal executive branch.

It does not order every private company, university, nonprofit, state government, consultant, software developer, or ordinary American to stop saying AI.

You can still call ChatGPT artificial intelligence.

Your company can still have an AI policy.

Your website can still say AI readiness.

Your job title does not suddenly have to become Super Intelligence Officer.

At least not because of this executive order.

That may sound obvious.

But every time government changes terminology, people tend to assume the terminology has universally changed.

It has not.

Not yet.

This Could Create Some Interesting Confusion

Imagine the next few years.

Federal agencies use SI.

Congressional statutes may still say AI.

States continue passing laws using artificial intelligence.

Businesses continue selling AI products.

Universities continue teaching artificial intelligence.

International standards continue using their own terminology.

Contracts reference AI.

Policies reference AI.

Insurance applications reference AI.

Then federal agencies begin talking about Super Intelligence.

That creates a language-management problem.

Organizations may need to understand that two different terms can still refer to the same underlying category of technology.

That may sound minor.

Compliance professionals know it is not.

Definitions matter.

Especially when contracts, laws, procurement requirements, and policies begin interacting.

Then There Is the Bigger AI Safety Conversation

The terminology change did not happen by itself.

The same White House event included a voluntary agreement involving major technology companies around frontier-system safety controls.

Reuters reported that participating companies agreed to a framework involving internal monitoring, dedicated safety teams, independent external audits, and board-level oversight.[2]

The agreement is voluntary rather than a new federal regulatory statute.

That matters too.

Because while the government is changing the language from Artificial Intelligence to Super Intelligence, the larger debate remains unresolved:

How much should AI companies regulate themselves?

How much should government regulate them?

What safety standards should be mandatory?

Who verifies compliance?

Who is accountable when systems fail?

Renaming the technology does not answer any of those questions.

AI Readiness Still Means the Same Thing

For organizations, my advice does not change because the federal government changed two words.

Know what systems your people are using.

Know what data they are putting into them.

Know what decisions those systems influence.

Know your vendors.

Know your risks.

Know when human review is required.

Know what laws apply.

Know what happens when the system is wrong.

Whether somebody calls it:

Artificial Intelligence,

AI,

Super Intelligence,

or SI,

the operational responsibility remains the same.

Do Not Get Distracted by the Name

I expect people will have fun with this.

Some will love the terminology.

Some will hate it.

Some will make jokes.

Some companies may adopt it.

Others may ignore it.

But I think there is a more useful question.

Does changing what we call the technology improve our understanding of the technology?

Because terminology can help.

Terminology can also create hype.

If “Super Intelligence” encourages people to think more seriously about how powerful these systems are becoming, perhaps the terminology serves a purpose.

If it causes people to assume the systems are more intelligent, autonomous, accurate, or trustworthy than they actually are, then we have created another problem.

The name changed.

Our responsibility did not.

Understand the system.

Understand its limitations.

Understand the risks.

Understand the opportunities.

Verify what matters.

Maintain human judgment.

That was true when we called it artificial intelligence.

It will still be true if Washington calls it Super Intelligence.

You can rename AI.

You cannot rename away the need for discernment.

Sources

[1] The White House, “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence,” Executive Order, September 29, 2026.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/09/inaugurating-the-era-of-super-intelligence/

[2] Reuters, “Trump, AI CEOs sign voluntary safety pact, back data center expansion,” September 29, 2026.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/trump-host-zuckerberg-anthropics-amodei-other-ai-titans-tuesday-2026-09-29/

Key takeaways

President Trump signed the executive order “Inaugurating the Era of Super Intelligence” on September 29, 2026.[1]
The order directs executive departments and agencies to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” instead of “Artificial Intelligence” and “AI” in new official correspondence, websites, reports, policy documents, and other non-statutory materials.[1]
Existing regulations, presidential actions, contracts, grants, and historical documents do not have to be rewritten.[1]
For purposes of the current order, Super Intelligence still uses the existing statutory definition of artificial intelligence.[1]
The President’s science and technology adviser has 60 days to propose legislative language for a federal definition of Super Intelligence.[1]
The executive order does not require private businesses, universities, state governments, or individuals to stop using the terms AI or Artificial Intelligence.
The terminology change does not itself improve the accuracy, reliability, safety, or capability of existing AI systems.
A separate voluntary industry agreement announced at the same White House event includes internal safety monitoring, independent auditing, and board-level oversight commitments.[2]

All articles